I’m growing so tired of this debate and I’m sure in some unknown span of time, it will no longer matter. But, recently someone asked why I was targeting TerpTools as a web application instead of building a native app. I wish the answer was simple and straight forward, but as most decisions are, it’s one-part pragmatism, one-part core belief, and one-part feeling the ever increase squeeze of time in my adult life.
First, I am a web developer. I considered my first language to be Perl. As my career progressed, I added other tools to my belt as various projects and managers deemed them worthy of the task. The mobile market is fragmented and diverging. I’m still amazed at programmers who are able to design simultaneously in Java and Objective-C. Really, I hold these programmers in high respect. Their audiences are potentially huge and they can spend time catering to one segment at a time. However, my audience (free-lance sign language interpreters) are a tiny, wide-spread bunch who use various phones, on different platforms, across multiple carriers. To build something that benefits the community, I want to focus at the task in front of me. So, one code base to serve a small community is what works for me right now.
Second, any good coder should respect the user and the user’s device. Programming on the open web does this. If you want to know what I’m doing on your device, look at the source code. If you don’t want the application to track your location, instruct your browser accordingly. Browsers are (supposedly) built to limit what code can do on your device. Native apps have more control in the device and the source might be closed. Granted this argument is still open to debate and will change. And frankly, it should be debated.